Thursday, June 26, 2014
Fat in the Land of Oz
Pictured above is singer
Kelly Clarkson, recently described by someone on You Tube as “a big fat pig.”
This is what’s considered fat in America, a country that not too long ago
managed to come up with a size 0 for women. I regard this as more of a
political slam than a fashion statement, an anti-feminist backlash intended to
intimidate women who may have forgotten to obsess about their body size for a
minute and think about reproductive rights and equal pay and voter suppression
and the economy instead. But our fat-loathing culture asks: “Who do these
broads think they are, waddling around, offending everyone’s sensibilities
instead of focusing on becoming a size 0” – (a literal nothing!). And of
course, if your size is a two-digit number you’re obese and shouldn’t even
leave the house (for shame!).
There are other things I
could write about today: Team America in the World Cup; Dick Cheney everywhere
on TV as if he were releasing a new album; how we shouldn’t even dip our military
toe into that sectarian quagmire in Iraq; or the Supreme Court striking down a law that said people
protesting outside abortion clinics had to keep a 35-foot distance away from
patients entering the clinic (because those ignorant, heartless, slut-baby-killers
deserve to be harassed up close before they do one of the most difficult things
in their lives).
But no, I prefer to
revisit last week’s chastisement of Dr. Oz by the U.S. Senate, which has
nothing better to do than lambast the host of an afternoon health information
talk show for describing two dietary supplements in what Oz admitted was
“flowery language.” He hailed them as magical and miraculous – two words that any adult would take literally. The
Senate was worried that the now-famous “Dr. Oz Effect” would encourage millions
of fat-obsessed women to run out and buy this shit without knowing what the dangers might be!
Now, it’s true that
dietary supplements, from vitamins to magic weight loss elixirs, are greatly
under-regulated, but so are numerous prescription medications that have so many
horrific side effects you can’t imagine what medical condition would warrant
taking them. Yet doctors can freely prescribe them as they see fit. What
doctors are stringently regulated in prescribing are “controlled substances,”
also known as serious meds that stop pain, ease anxiety, help you sleep, or
just make you feel good. Which is why, after an agonizing major surgery, you’re
offered Tylenol.
But I digress. The real
issue here is that after 40 years of empowering, self-affirming, feminist
philosophy, women young and old still view being “fat” as the worst thing that
can happen to them. I’ll never forget the late Gilda Radner saying she would
rather have cancer than be fat – and that sweet, brilliant comedian died young
and slim – and riddled with cancer.
I haven’t watched Dr. Oz’s
show over the past couple of years, but I previously saw it often. I also once
met with him privately, back in the 90s before he was a star, because the
then-wife of a friend of mine was a friend of his and he saw me as a courtesy
to her. I honestly don’t remember what he advised, but I do recall that in
person, as on his show, he was kind, non-judgmental, gentle, and seemed
genuinely concerned about my health.
Since then as now I was
truly fat, not cosmetically chubby or a perfectly normal weight but fat in my
fearful imagination, one could say concern was warranted. I was in my 40s then
and still dieted frequently. People who are really
fat know that any diet (combined with even minor exercise) will take weight
off. What no one has figured out is how to keep
it off without dieting for life, because what science and medicine
understand about real obesity can fit on the head of the proverbial pin. But
Dr. Oz is no charlatan and he didn’t deserve a scolding by the Senate. He tells
people to eat healthfully and exercise – and when he finds a product he thinks
will help, he talks about it.
My mother used to say that if anyone ever came
up with the real magic pill – the one
that would take weight off, keep it off, and still let you eat at least
somewhat for pleasure, it would be news on the front page of The New York
Times. I know Americans can be stupid about lots of things, so just keep her
sensible observation in mind. Until that article appears, really fat people
will have to really struggle, if they’re willing. The rest of you should just
get a grip. You don’t have to be a 0. You’re not a big fat pig. Stop letting
the haters manipulate you. Here: have a cookie.
Posted by MizB at 9:22 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
It's not dieting for life, it's not overeating for life.
Ah, if only it were that simple, Anonymous No-Nothing. Overeating is an addiction and there truly are genetic components. There are people who can eat the way I do and never gain an ounce, while many overeaters can just look at certain foods and gain weight. You make it sound so simple. Simple is what it's not. But thanks for contributing to the hostile, hateful, judgmental climate.
Anonymous, I apologize for my first reply. Your comment pissed me off because it showed a complete lack of understanding of the dynamics of compulsive overeating and the genetic and other biological elements involved. It's like saying to an alcoholic: just drink moderately. However, I now realize several truths simultaneously: 1) You have a right to comment anonymously if you wish and 2)since I don't know who reads this blog besides the people I send post alerts to, you may have chosen to be anonymous so as not to hurt my feelings. But 3)what really gets me is that out of all the things I wrote about: the cruelty to fat people, the making any woman with a little flesh on her bones feel like a pig, the marginalization of women because of their body size and much more, all you had to say was "just eat less"? Friend or stranger, that truly misses the points that are bigger and more important than the body size of fat people. I apologize for being rude, but you just don't get it.
Post a Comment